«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中华肺部疾病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2022年06期

页码:

787-791

栏目:

论著

出版日期:

2022-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Comparative effectiveness of different movement therapies for improving upper motor function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A network Meta-analysis

作者:

刘晓青; 张雪玲; 刘权兴; 罗茂雨; 戴纪刚

400037 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学第二附属医院胸外科

Author(s):

Liu Xiaoqing;  Zhang Xueling;  Liu Xingquan;  Luo Maoyu;  Dai Jigang.

Department of chest surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037,China

关键词:

支气管肺癌;  网状Meta分析;  胸腔引流;  拔管时机

Keywords:

Bronchogenic carcinoma;  Reticular Meta-analysis;  Thoracic drainage;  Extubation

分类号:

R734.2

DOI:

10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2022.06.004

摘要:

目的 采用网状Meta分析方法系统评价肺癌术后24 h引流量<100 ml、200 ml、300 ml、400 ml不同时机拔管的临床结局。方法 在PubMed、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science 以及中文数据库万方、CBM、CNKI检索关于肺癌术后不同时机拔管的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial, RCT),检索时限从建库到2019年11月。按照纳入标准进行文献筛选、数据提取及质量评价后,采用stata 14.0和Review Manage软件进行网状Meta分析。结果 通过直接Meta分析发现胸腔积液100 ml与300 ml(RR:0.41,95%CI:0.19～0.90,P=0.03); 二次置管100 ml与300 ml比较(RR:0.43,95%CI:0.19～0.97,P=0.04); 100 ml与200 ml比较(MD:1.70,95%CI:0.57～2.82,P=0.003); 100 ml与300 ml比较(MD:2.32,95%CI:1.31～3.33,P<0.001); 200 ml与300 ml比较(MD:1.68,95%CI:1.34～2.01,P<0.001)。结论 胸腔引流液拔除管道住院时间短,相比并发症高。胸腔引流液100 ml时拔除胸腔闭式引流管,并发症发生率低,胸腔引流液150 ml时拔除为最佳时间。

Abstract:

Objective To systematically evaluate and analyze the clinical outcomes of extubation at different times when the drainage volume of lung cancer is less than 100 ml, 200 ml, 300 ml, 400 ml 24 hours after operation by using reticular Meta-analysis. Methods randomized controlled trial(RCT)of extubation at different times after lung cancer surgery was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Chinese databases Wanfang, CBM and CNKI. The search time was from the establishment of the database to November 2019. Two researchers conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation according to the inclusion criteria, and then used stata 14.0 and Review Manage software to conduct network Meta-analysis. Results Through direct meta-analysis, the pleural effusion was 100 ml and 300 ml(RR: 0.41, 95%CI: 0.19～0.90, P=0.03). 100 ml of secondary catheter was compared with 300 ml(RR: 0.43,95%CI: 0.19～0.97,P=0.04); 100 ml compared with 200 ml(MD: 1.70, 95%CI: 0.57～2.82, P=0.003); 100 ml compared with 300 ml(MD: 2.32, 95%CI: 1.31～3.33, P<0.001); 200 ml compared with 300 ml(MD: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.34～2.01, P<0.001). Conclusion The more pleural drainage fluid, the shortest hospitalization time after removing the tube, but the highest complications. When the thoracic drainage fluid is 100ml, the closed thoracic drainage tube is removed, and the complication rate is the lowest, but the hospitalization time is long. Therefore, according to the analysis of the final data in this paper, it is the best scheme to remove the pleural fluid when it is 150 ml.

参考文献/References:

1 王洪武, 金发光. 晚期非小细胞肺癌多域整合治疗策略[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(4): 457-461.
2 Cordeiro A, Carvalho S, Leite MC, et al. Impact of lung expansion therapy using positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 34(6): 699-703.
3 Awad HA, Khafagy SM, Ahmed NT, et al. Lung ultrasonography as tool for follow up of ventilated neonates for prediction of weaning readiness. QJM: An Inter J Med, 2021. 114(Supplement1). DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab113.013
4 Okabe Y, Asaga T, Bekku S, et al. Lung-thorax compliance measured during a spontaneous breathing trial is a good index of extubation failure in the surgical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Intensive Care, 2018, 6: 44.
5 Banerjee A, Mehrotra G. Comparison of lung ultrasound-based weaning indices with rapid shallow Breathing Index: Are They Helpful? [J]. Indian J Crit Care Med, 2018, 22(6): 435-440.
6 Ai Q, Deng H, Huang D, et al. Early extubation in operating room after single-lung transplantation: a single institutional experience[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(4): 4134-4142.
7 Bolzan DW, Gomes WJ, Rocco IS, et al. Early open-lung ventilation improves clinical outcomes in patients with left cardiac dysfunction undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 31(5): 358-364.
8 Labarinas S, Coss-Bu JA, Onyearugbulem C, et al. Influence of early extubation on post-operative outcomes after pediatric lung transplantation[J]. Pediatr Transplant, 2021, 25(2): e13776.
9 Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, et al. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2002, 195(5): 658-662.
10 韩洪利, 张 逊, 王冬滨, 等. 电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸腔引流量与拔管时机的研究[J]. 天津医药, 2015, 43(1): 85-87.
11 Soliman RM, Elsayed Y, Said RN, et al. Prediction of extubation readiness using lung ultrasound in preterm infants[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2021, 56(7): 2073-2080.
12 Li R, Shi J, Huang D, et al. Preoperative risk factors for successful extubation or not after lung transplantation[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2020,12(12): 7135-7144.
13 Hatef J, Hatef S, Drain JP, et al. Protocol-driven ea ne Deform, 2022,10(3): 689-696.
14 张惟越. 早期移除胸腔闭式引流与患者在院及出院并发症的分析[D]. 大连医科大学, 2021, 42-55.
15 Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, et al. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(1): 60-67.
16 Xie H, Xu K, Tang JX, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 21(2): 200-205.
17 Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S. Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Inj Violence Res, 2009, 1(1): 33-36.
18 闵 波, 朱 逸, 王成祥, 等. 单根细管引流联合早期拔管在肺癌患者胸腔镜肺叶切除术的应用[J]. 江苏医药, 2019, 45(11): 1100-1104.
19 孙光亚, 刘贤广, 王淑英, 等. 电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术后不同胸腔引流量时拔除胸管对患者恢复的影响[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(24): 132-133.
20 周景海, 李 坤, 李彦宁, 等. 肺癌、食管癌切除术后胸腔闭式引流管拔除时机的随机对照研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(9): 853-857.
21 王颖琦, 翟 婧, 侯 力. 肺癌术后闭式胸腔引流量对拔管时机的影响研究[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2013, 15(9): 1547-1548.
22 张卫强, 刘克强, 裴迎新, 等. 肺叶切除术后胸腔引流方法的改进对快速康复的影响[J/CD]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2015, 7(7): 56-58.
23 张 晔, 李 辉, 胡 滨, 等. 肺叶切除术后早期拔除胸腔引流管的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2013(6): 533-537.
24 李 伟, 金 哲, 段东奎. 老年肺癌手术患者胸腔引流管不同拔除时机的对比[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(16): 4534-4536.
25 吴 斌, 陈海生. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后不同胸腔引流量下拔管的效果观察[J]. 西南国防医药, 2018, 28(11): 1103-1105.
26 李 昀, 廖洪映, 孟占鳌. 胸腔镜肺癌根治术后早期拔除胸管的回顾性分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2015, 31(13): 2140-2142.
27 McHugh E, Gubichuk M, Malhotra S. 847 Rapid Improvement of Pulmonary Hypertension with Adequate Ventilatory Support in Patient with Prader-Willi Syndrome. Sleep, 2021. 44(Supplement2): A329-A330.
28 Hessami MA, Najafi F, Hatami S. Volume threshold for chest tube removal: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Inj Violence Res, 2009, 1(1): 33-36.
29 Kaur R,Vines DL, Patel AD, et al. Early identification of extubation failure using integrated pulmonary index and high-risk factors[J]. Respir Care, 2021, 66(10): 1542-1548.
30 郭 虹, 施庆彤, 卞晓蕾. 拔管前预处理在肺癌术后快速康复中的应用[J]. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19(13): 184-187.
31 吴砚铭, 车国卫. 肺癌术后胸腔引流临床应用新进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2020, 27(3): 354-358.
32 Haaksma ME, Smit JM, Heldeweg M, et al. Holistic Ultrasound to Predict Extubation Failure in Clinical Practice[J]. Respir Care, 2021, 66(6): 994-1003.
33 Li Y, JiaY, Wang H, et al. Early extubation is associated with improved outcomes after complete surgical repair of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and hypoplastic pulmonary arteries in pediatric patients[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2021, 16(1): 31.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

通信作者: 刘权兴, Email: 215584683@qq.com

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-20