«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中华肺部疾病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2024年05期

页码:

762-767

栏目:

论著

出版日期:

2024-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:

Analysis of severe rescue treatment for blunt trauma aortic arch in the elderly

作者:

邵世锋¹; 肖 钦²; 沈方龙¹; 张 迅¹; 郝志鹏³; 伍正彬¹; 谢晓娟⁴; 王耀丽¹

400042 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学大坪医院重症医学科¹
400042 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学大坪医院放射科²
400042 重庆,陆军(第三)军医大学大坪医院胸外科³
402160 重庆,重庆市永川区人民医院重症医学科⁴

Author(s):

Shao Shifeng¹;  Xiao Qin²;  Shen Fanglong¹;  Zhang Xun¹;  Hao Zhipeng³;  Wu Zhengbin¹;  Xie Xiaojuan⁴;  Wang Yaoli¹.

¹Department of Critical Care Medicine, Daping Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China; ²Department of Radiology, Daping Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China; ³Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China; ⁴Department of Critical Care Medicine, Yongchuan District People's Hospital, Chongqing 402160, ChinA

关键词:

主动脉钝性伤;  临床特点;  老年人;  重症监护

Keywords:

Blunt thoracic trauma;  Clinical characteristics;  Elderly;  Critical care

分类号:

R563

DOI:

10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2024.05.016

摘要:

目的 分析老年胸主动脉钝性伤(blunt traumatic aortic injury, BTAI)的临床特点及损伤机制,对老年BTAI重症救治经验进行分析。方法 选择2013年1月至2022年1月我院重症医学科(intensive care unit, ICU)收治的BTAI 患者19例,≥60岁9例为观察组,<60岁10例为对照组,比较两组疾病发生、发展及转归差异,总结重症救治策略。结果 观察组Stanford分型、损伤起始部位、治疗前心率(80.78±17.31)次/min、脉压差(56.44±16.49)mmHg、白细胞(white blood cell, WBC)(11.50±4.55)10⁹/L、血小板(platelet counts, PLT)(175.56±59.49)10⁹/L、纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen, Fib)3.11(2.69,4.73)g/L、血清D-二聚体(D-dimer, D-D)7 379.00(2 300.78,9 758.00)μg/L、肌钙蛋白T(cardiac troponin, cTnT)0.01(0.01,0.02)μg/L较对照组Stanford分型、损伤起始部位、治疗前心率(95.00±15.43)次/min、脉压差(59.70±17.79)mmHg、WBC(13.51±7.17)10⁹/L、PLT(217.60±201.79)10⁹/L、Fib 3.28(2.66,4.18)g/L、D-D 2 501.50(1 099.44,6 404.50)μg/L、cTnT 0.11(0.01,0.27)μg/L差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术治疗3例(33.33%)低于对照组手术治疗9例(90.00%)(P<0.05); 观察组住院时间14(7,18)d、ICU住院时间0(0,5)d、再次入住ICU次数0(0,1)次与对照组住院时间21(17,32)d、ICU住院时间8(4,12)d、再次入住ICU次数1(1,2)次比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 BTAI全年龄段可发生,老年BTAI Stanford分型、损伤特点及临床表现与年轻BTAI无差异; 老年BTAI治疗选择非手术治疗为主,ICU重症综合救治管理改善老年BTAI非手术治疗预后。

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics and injury mechanism of blunt traumatic aortic injury(BTAI)in the elderly, and to discuss the experience of severe treatment of BTAI in the elderly. Methods A total of 19 BTAI patients admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU)of our hospital from January 2013 to January 2022 were selected, with 9 patients ≥60 years old as the observation group and 10 patients < 60 years old as the control group. The differences in disease occurrence, development and outcome between the two groups were compared, and the critical treatment strategies were summarized. Results Stanford classification, injury start site, heart rate before treatment(80.78±17.31)times /min, pulse pressure difference(56.44±16.49)mmHg, white blood cell(WBC)(11.50±4.55)10⁹/L, platelet counts(PLT)(175.56±59.49)10⁹/L, fibrinogen(Fib)3.11(2.69,4.73)g/L, serum D-dimer(D-D)7 379.00(2 300.78,9 758.00)μg/L, cardiac troponin T(cardiac troponin, cTnT)0.01(0.01,0.02)μg/L in observation group compared with Stanford classification, injury initiation site, heart rate before treatment(95.00±15.43)times/min, pulse pressure difference(59.70±17.79)mmHg, WBC(13.51±7.17)10⁹/L, PLT(217. 60±201.79)10⁹/L Fib 3.28(2.66,4.18)g/L, D-D 2 501.50(1 099.44, 6 404.50)μg/L, cTnT 0.11(0.01, 0.27)μg/L in control group(P>0.05). There were 3 cases(33.33%)in the observation group and 9 cases(90.00%)in the control group(P<0.05). The length of stay in the observation group was 14(7,18)d, the length of stay in the ICU was 0(0,5)d and the number of re-admission to the ICU was 0(0,1)times compared with the length of stay in the ICU was 21(17,32)d, the length of stay in the ICU was 8(4,12)d and the number of re-admission to the ICU was 1(1,2)times(P<0.05)in the control group. Conclusion BTAI can occur across all age groups. The Stanford classification, injury characteristics, and clinical features of elderly BTAI patients show no differences compared to younger counterparts. For elderly BTAI patients, non-surgical treatment is primarily chosen, and intensive care unit management significantly improves the prognosis for those receiving non-surgical interventions.

参考文献/References:

1 Flagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, et al. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality[J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(4): 717-723.
2 Dennis BM, Bellister SA, Guillamondegui OD. Thoracic trauma[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 97(5): 1047-1064.
3 Ferrah N, Cameron P, Gabbe B, et al. Ageing population has changed the nature of major thoracic injury[J]. Emerg Med J, 2019, 36(6): 340-345.
4 Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Barmparas G, et al. Blunt thoracic aortic injuries: an autopsy study[J]. J Trauma, 2011, 70(1): 197-202.
5 de Mestral C, Dueck A, Sharma SS, et al. Evolution of the incidence, management, and mortality of blunt thoracic aortic injury: a population-based analysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(6): 1110-1115.
6 Bade-Boon J, Mathew JK, Fitzgerald MC, et al. Do patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury present to hospital with unstable vital signs? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Emerg Med J, 2018, 35(4): 231-237.
7 O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2013, 127(4): e362-e425.
8 Fabian TC, Richardson JD, Croce MA, et al. Prospective study of blunt aortic injury: multicenter trial of the american association for the surgery of trauma[J]. J Trauma, 1997, 42(3): 374-380.
9 Richens D, Kotidis K, Neale M, et al. The results of the co-operative crash injury study[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2003, 23(2): 143-148.
10 Symbas PN. Cardiothoracic trauma[J]. Curr Probl Surg, 1991, 28(11): 741-797.
11 Jonker FH, Trimarchi S, Muhs BE, et al. The role of age in complicated acute type B aortic dissection[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(6): 2129-2134.
12 Rylski B, Hoffmann I, Beyersdorf F, et al. Acute aortic dissection type A: age-related management and outcomes reported in the german registry for acute aortic dissection type a(GERAADA)of over 2000 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(3): 598-604.
13 张 静, 杨梦思, 金小芹, 等. 不同年龄急性主动脉夹层患者临床特征及院内预后分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2019, 11(9): 1104-1107.
14 Gaffey AC, Zhang J, Saka E, et al. Natural history of nonoperative management of grade Ⅱ blunt thoracic aortic injury[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2020, 65: 124-129.
15 Sandhu HK, Leonard SD, Perlick A, et al. Determinants and outcomes of nonoperative management for blunt traumatic aortic injuries[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 67(2): 389-398.
16 Mosquera VX, Marini M, Lopez-Perez JM, et al. Role of conservative management in traumatic aortic injury: comparison of long-term results of conservative, surgical, and endovascular treatment[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011, 142(3): 614-621.
17 贺 新, 余海彬, 黄伟华, 等. 基于血流动力学探究计算机有限元仿真胸主动脉腔内修复术的有效性及预测价值[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2023, 30(12): 1731-1736.
18 王仕奇, 王凌云, 林志鸿, 等. 基于计算流体力学的个性化Stanford B型主动脉夹层血流动力学研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2024, 31(4): 594-599.
19 王宇菲, 范文静, 姜志胜, 等. 主动脉夹层模型的最新研究进展[J]. 中国动脉硬化杂志, 2017, 25(8): 841-844-860.
20 Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the american heart association/american college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2022,146(24): e334-e482.
21 Zeng W, Caudillo A, Mukherjee S, et al. Development and multi-level validation of a computational model to predict traumatic aortic injury[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2021, 136: 104700.
22 Kapoor H, Lee JT, Orr NT, et al. Minimal aortic injury: mechanisms, imaging manifestations, natural history, and management[J]. Radiographics, 2020, 40(7): 1834-1847.
23 Richens D, Field M, Neale M, et al. The mechanism of injury in blunt traumatic rupture of the aorta[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002, 21(2): 288-293.
24 张 婉, 符伟国, 陈 斌, 等. 腔内治疗钝性主动脉损伤的中期随访及主动脉重构 [J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2018, 25(4): 278-283.
25 Gawinecka J, Schönrath F, von Eckardstein A. Acute aortic dissection: pathogenesis, risk factors and diagnosis[J]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2017, 147: w14489.
26 Dahal R, Acharya Y, Tyroch AH, et al. Blunt thoracic aortic injury and contemporary management strategy[J]. Angiology, 2022, 73(6): 497-507.
27 Sun J, Ren K, Zhang L, et al. Traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injury: a 10-year single-center retrospective analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2022, 17(1): 335.
28 中华医学会心血管病学分会大血管学组, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 急性主动脉夹层合并冠心病的诊断与治疗策略中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2021, 49(11): 1074-1081.
29 Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. ESC committee for practice guidelines. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology(ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35(41): 2873-2926.
30 Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update[J]. Eur Heart J, 2018, 39(9): 739-749d.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金资助: 全军临床重点专科; 重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项重点项目(CSTC2021jscx-gksb-N0007)
通信作者: 伍正彬, Email: 659926416@qq.com
谢晓娟, Email: 513969029@qq.com

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-25