«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中华肺部疾病杂志》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2025年03期

页码:

350-354

栏目:

论著

出版日期:

2025-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:

Safety and efficacy of low-dose SPECT/CT pulmonary perfusion imaging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with pulmonary embolism

作者:

吴春兴¹; 廖 庆¹; 杨海玲²; 袁海娟¹; 彭小林¹; 张 峰¹; 范日升¹; 谢良骏¹

510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院核医学科¹
510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院呼吸与危重症医学科²

Author(s):

Wu Chunxing¹;  Liao Qing¹;  Yang Hailing²;  Yuan Haijuan¹;  Peng Xiaolin¹;  Zhang Feng¹;  Fan Risheng¹;  Xie Liangjun¹.

¹Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China; ²Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Third Afsfiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China

关键词:

肺疾病; 慢性阻塞性;  肺栓塞;  单光子发射型计算机断层;  肺灌注;  计算机断层扫描;  低剂量

Keywords:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;  Pulmonary embolism;  Single photon emission computed tomography;  Pulmonary perfusion;  Computed tomography;  Low-dose

分类号:

R563

DOI:

10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2025.03.002

摘要:

目的 分析单光子发射型计算机断层(single photon emission computed tomography, SPECT)肺灌注显像/低剂量计算机断层扫描(computed tomography, CT)诊断慢性阻塞性肺疾病(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD)并发肺栓塞(pulmonary embolism, PE)患者的安全性和有效性。方法 选择2014年1月至2024年12月我院收治的COPD疑似PE患者80例为对象,患者接受SPECT肺灌注显像及低剂量肺部CT检查(同机检查),融合显像,记录显像过程中不良反应。以最终出院结果为标准,分析对比SPECT、低剂量CT、SPECT/CT检测结果及诊断价值; 记录不同显像技术对肺部病变检出率及肺影像学特征。结果 80例COPD疑似PE患者中确诊PE 43例,非PE 37例。SPECT/CT融合、SPECT、低剂量CT诊断结果分别为阳性40例、30例、35例,阴性35例、25例、28例。SPECT/CT融合诊断一致性(Kappa=0.843)高于SPECT、低剂量CT, SPECT/CT的诊断灵敏度93.02%、特异性94.59%、阳性预测值95.24%、阴性预测值92.11%及准确性93.75%高于SPECT 69.77%、67.57%、71.43%、65.79%、68.75%、低剂量CT 81.40%、75.68%、79.55%、77.78%、78.75%(P<0.05)。确诊PE 43例中肺段病变91个,亚肺段病变97个。SPECT/CT、SPECT、低剂量CT显像技术对PF肺段病变检出率分别为92.31%、83.52%、85.71%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),SPECT/CT融合对亚肺段病变检出率95.88%高于SPECT 76.29%、低剂量CT 81.44%(P<0.05)。PE患者SPECT肺灌注显像可见单个或多个放射性稀疏缺损区,放射性分布均匀或不均匀。低剂量CT图像可见肺血管走行区域充盈缺损,肺透亮度增加,肺纹理稀疏。SPECT/CT融合图像中PE患者肺段放射性稀疏缺损与肺血管走行区域充盈缺损匹配。结论 低剂量SPECT/ CT肺灌注融合显像诊断COPD并发PE具有有效性及安全性,可为临床PE诊断提供参考具有意义。

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the safety and efficacy of diagnosis of single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT)lung perfusion imaging/low-dose computed tomography(CT)in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)complicated by pulmonary embolism(PE). Methods Eighty COPD patients suspected of PE admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2024 were selected as subjects. The patients underwent SPECT lung perfusion imaging and low-dose lung CT examination(same-machine examination), followed by image post-processing fusion. Adverse reactions during imaging were recorded. Using the final discharge results as the gold standard, the diagnostic results and value of SPECT, low-dose CT, and SPECT/CT were analyzed and compared. The detection rates and imaging characteristics of different imaging techniques for lesion locations were recorded. Results Among the 80 COPD patients suspected of PE, the gold standard confirmed 43 cases of PE and 37 cases of non-PE. The diagnostic results of SPECT/CT fusion, SPECT, and low-dose CT were 40 positive cases, 30 positive cases, and 35 positive cases, and 35 negative cases, 25 negative cases, and 28 negative cases, respectively. The diagnostic consistency of SPECT/CT fusion(Kappa=0.843)was higher than that of SPECT and low-dose CT. The diagnostic sensitivity(93.02%), specificity(94.59%), positive predictive value(95.24%), negative predictive value(92.11%), and accuracy(93.75%)of SPECT/CT fusion were higher than those of SPECT(69.77%, 67.57%, 71.43%, 65.79%, 68.75%)and low-dose CT(81.40%, 75.68%, 79.55%, 77.78%, 78.75%)(P<0.05). Among the 43 PE cases diagnosed by the gold standard, there were 91 segmental lesions and 97 subsegmental lesions. The detection rates of segmental lesions by different imaging techniques(92.31% vs. 83.52% vs. 85.71%)showed no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). However, the detection rate of subsegmental lesions by SPECT/CT fusion(95.88%)was higher than that by SPECT(76.29%)and low-dose CT(81.44%)(P<0.05). In PE patients, SPECT lung perfusion imaging showed single or multiple radioactive sparse defect area, with uniform or uneven radioactive distribution. Low-dose CT images revealed filling defects in the pulmonary vascular pathways, increased lung translucency, and sparse lung texture. In SPECT/CT fusion images, the radioactive sparse defect area in the lung of PE patients matched the filling defects in the pulmonary vascular pathways. Conclusion Low-dose SPECT/CT lung perfusion fusion imaging is effective and safe for diagnosing COPD complicated with PE, providing accurate information for clinical PE diagnosis.

参考文献/References:

1 张长洪, 刘建华, 赵建清, 等. 老年人群慢性阻塞性肺疾病流行病学及其影响因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(19): 4851-4854.
2 Han W, Wang M, Xie Y, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thromboembolism in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 732855.
3 吴文彬, 陈昌枝, 杨冬莲, 等. D-二聚体、B型钠尿肽与血气在慢性阻塞性肺疾病继发肺栓塞的预测价值[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(6): 743-746.
4 彭丽阁, 刘师漫, 蒲佳琪, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺栓塞院内不良结局相关因素及sPESI评分对其预测价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(42): 3889-3895.
5 陈芳玮, 梁彦超, 廖亮, 等. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肠道菌群分布、血浆N端脑钠肽前体和D-二聚体水平及其合并肺栓塞的相关危险因素分析[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2020, 37(11): 1071-1074.
6 刘 霁, 郝美丽, 谭 叶, 等. SPECT肺灌注显像优化肺癌放疗计划对肺功能保护价值的研究[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1117-1121.
7 Lasloom MD, Abuzaid M. Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism: Integrating low-dose CT with V/Q SPECT[J]. Tomography, 2024, 10(8): 1294-1302.
8 石俊岭, 张岭岭, 王海洋, 等. SPECT/CT肺灌注显像与肺通气/灌注平面显像在肺栓塞诊断中的应用比较[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2020, 18(6): 79-81.
9 任成山, 王关嵩, 钱桂生. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成因及其治疗的困惑与希望[J/CD]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(2): 127-141.
10 中华医学会心血管病学分会肺血管病学组. 急性肺栓塞诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2015)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2016, 44(3): 197-211.
11 Osman M, Subedi SK, Ahmed A, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography is overused to diagnose pulmonary embolism in the emergency department of academic community hospital[J]. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect, 2018, 8(1): 6-10.
12 彭 千, 谢航宇, 刘春涛. 肺通气灌注显像在定量评估哮喘患者肺功能中的应用[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2021, 20(4): 247-253.
13 富 青, 杨 明, 雷子乔, 等. 基于第3代双源CT双低检查技术在肺栓塞成像的临床应用研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2020, 40(9): 712-716.
14 朱月峰, 岳 明, 李正标. 低剂量对比剂计算机断层扫描肺动脉血管成像对肺栓塞的诊断价值[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2023, 9(10): 1273-1276.
15 Conrad TJ, Lau HX, Yerkovich ST, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scan for diagnosing pulmonary embolism: do chest x-rays matter?[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2024, 45(3): 181-187.
16 Iftikhar IH, Iftikhar NH, Naeem M, et al. SPECT ventilation/perfusion imaging for acute pulmonary embolism: Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy[J]. Acad Radiol, 2024, 31(2): 706-717.
17 Le Pennec R, Le Roux PY, Robin P, et al. Comparison of three diagnostic strategies for suspicion of pulmonary embolism: planar ventilation-perfusion scan(V/Q), CT pulmonary angiography(CTPA)and single photon emission CT ventilation-perfusion scan(SPECT V/Q): a protocol of a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2024, 14(5): e075712.
18 Li HT, Zhang FX, Gong SG, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of ventilation-perfusion single photo emission computed tomography/computed tomography for pulmonary hypertension due to fibrinous mediastinitis[J]. Acad Radiol, 2025, 32(3): 1725-1733.
19 Fox T, Geppert J, Dinnes J, et al. Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2022, 11(11): CD013652.
20 Robertson L, Broderick C, Yeoh SE, et al. Effect of testing for cancer on cancer-or venous thromboembolism(VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, 10(10): CD010837.
21 丁新华, 王海军, 王道英, 等. SPECT/CT肺灌注显像评价肺动脉球囊扩张成形术治疗慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压效果[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2020, 36(7): 1022-1026.
22 王 茸, 王永乐, 刘自强, 等. SPECT/CT融合显像在肺灌注平面显像单侧肺不显影病因诊断中的增益价值[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2024, 48(8): 477-483.
23 张二兵. 急性肺栓塞诊断中同机低剂量CT融合显像与肺灌注单光子发射计算机断层成像术显像的诊断价值[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(12): 1965-1967.
24 Yildirim N, Genc M. The efficiency of hybrid perfusion SPECT/CT imaging in the diagnostic strategy of pulmonary thromboembolism[J]. Hell J Nucl Med, 2020, 23(3): 304-311.
25 Lasloom MD, Abuzaid M. Enhanced diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism: integrating low-dose CT with V/Q SPECT[J]. Tomography, 2024, 10(8): 1294-1302.
26 Thanuja M, Maimanah M, Sara U. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism:A comparison between ventilation/perfusion SPECT/CT and perfusion-only SPECT/CT[J]. Med J Malaysia, 2020, 75(5): 490-493.
27 Das JP, Yeh R, Schöder H. Clinical utility of perfusion(Q)-single-photon emission computed tomography(SPECT)/CT for diagnosing pulmonary embolus(PE)in COVID-19 patients with a moderate to high pre-test probability of PE[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(3): 794-799.
28 Sanchez-Crespo A. Lung ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT)in infants and children with nonembolic chronic pulmonary disorders[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 2019, 49(1): 37-46.
29 石俊岭, 张岭岭, 程 峰, 等. SPECT/CT肺灌注显像与CT肺动脉造影在肺栓塞诊断中的应用比较[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2019, 17(12): 32-34.
30 陈聪霞, 李 旭, 刘甫庚, 等. 肺通气/灌注单光子发射计算机断层和低剂量CT融合显像在老年人肺栓塞中的诊断价值[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 827-833.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目: 高校基本科研专业青年教师培训项目(20ykpy36)
通信作者: 谢良骏, Email: xielj9@mail.sysu.edu.cn

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-06-25